SEQUIVA · Preliminary in-vitro report

Microplastic
adsorption.
A strain-specific study.

Preliminary in-vitro evaluation of microplastic adsorption by SEQUIVA probiotic product strains.

Product contextSEQUIVA probiotic product
Study typeIn-vitro fluorescent particle assay
Polymers evaluatedPE · PP · PET

Global annual plastic production has surpassed 400 million metric tons, with polyethylene (PE) and polypropylene (PP) collectively accounting for a substantial proportion of total output. PE, PP, polyamide (PA), and polyethylene terephthalate (PET) are among the most prevalent microplastics identified in environmental matrices.

Evidence of human exposure to microplastics has accumulated in recent years. Published studies cited in the source report describe detection of plastic particles in human blood and lung tissue, including PET, PE, PP, and other polymer types. Additional experimental literature has reported inflammatory responses associated with selected microplastics in cellular and animal models.

In this context, the SEQUIVA study employed fluorescent microparticles to evaluate whether selected probiotic strains associated with the SEQUIVA probiotic product possess the capacity to adsorb PP, PE, and PET particles under controlled in-vitro conditions.

Study objective

The objective of this preliminary SEQUIVA report was to evaluate the in-vitro adsorption capacity of selected SEQUIVA probiotic product strains toward three common microplastic polymers: PE, PP, and PET.

37°CIncubation temperature
4 hoursIncubation duration
0.1 μmParticle size

Materials & methods

A 30 microliter aliquot of bacterial culture at an optical density of 600 nm (OD600) = 1.2 was transferred into a 2 mL centrifuge tube containing 270 microliters of PE, PET, or PP fluorescent microparticle working solution (0.16 mg/mL; particle size, 0.1 micrometer). The tubes were incubated in the dark on a shaking incubator at 37 degrees C and 130 rpm for 4 hours.

Following incubation, the mixtures were centrifuged at 2000 rpm for 10 minutes. A 200 microliter aliquot of the supernatant was transferred into a 96-well black microplate, and fluorescence intensity was measured using a Thermo Fisher Scientific multimode microplate reader at an excitation wavelength of 485 nm and emission wavelength of 525 nm.

Adsorption ratio

AR (%) = (A₁ − A₂) / A₁ × 100%

A₁
Supernatant fluorescence intensity of the phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) control group.
A₂
Supernatant fluorescence intensity of the respective test strain group.
03 / Results

Different polymers.
Different responses.

Four selected strains were evaluated. All four showed higher adsorption efficiency for PET than for PP and PE in the reported assay.

PET Polyethylene terephthalate93.9%

L. plantarum BM2615

Highest observed adsorption in the assay.
PP Polypropylene57.2%

L. plantarum BM2615

Highest PP adsorption among tested strains.
PE Polyethylene53.3%

L. salivarius BM2661

Highest PE adsorption among tested strains.

Approximate adsorption ratios. Each value represents the highest-performing strain for that polymer under the tested conditions.

L. plantarum BM2615 demonstrated superior adsorption toward PET and PP, while L. salivarius BM2661 showed relatively higher selective adsorption toward PE. L. rhamnosus BM2655 showed the lowest adsorption ratios for both PE and PP.

Original study figure: PP, PE and PET adsorption ratios for four strains, with error bars and full strain names. PET shows the highest adsorption across all four strains.
Figure 1. Adsorption ratios of selected SEQUIVA probiotic product strains toward PP, PE, and PET fluorescent microparticles. Original figure from the report; select to enlarge.

These findings provide preliminary in-vitro evidence that selected strains associated with the SEQUIVA probiotic product can adsorb common microplastic particles under the tested assay conditions. The data are most appropriately described as strain- and polymer-specific adsorption results.

The scientifically supported terminology is adsorption, not absorption. The assay measures the reduction in fluorescent particles remaining in the supernatant after incubation and centrifugation; it does not establish plastic degradation or human microplastic removal.

Conclusion

This preliminary SEQUIVA report demonstrates measurable in-vitro adsorption of PE, PP, and PET fluorescent microparticles by selected SEQUIVA probiotic product strains. The strongest adsorption was observed for PET by L. plantarum BM2615 at approximately 93.9%, with additional polymer-specific activity observed for PP and PE.

  1. Beijer, N. R. M., Dehaut, A., Carlier, M. P., Wolter, H., Versteegen, R. M., Pennings, J. L. A., de la Fonteyne, L., Niemann, H., Janssen, H. M., Timmermans, B. G., et al. (2022). Relationship between particle properties and immunotoxicological effects of environmentally-sourced microplastics. Frontiers in Water, 4, 866732.
  2. Danso, I. K., Woo, J. H., & Lee, K. (2022). Pulmonary toxicity of polystyrene, polypropylene, and polyvinyl chloride microplastics in mice. Molecules, 27(22), 7926.
  3. He, B., Smith, M., Egodawatta, P., Ayoko, G. A., Rintoul, L., & Goonetilleke, A. (2021). Dispersal and transport of microplastics in river sediments. Environmental Pollution, 279, 116884.
  4. Jenner, L. C., Rotchell, J. M., Bennett, R. T., Cowen, M., Tentzeris, V., & Sadofsky, L. R. (2022). Detection of microplastics in human lung tissue using micro-FTIR spectroscopy. Science of the Total Environment, 831, 154907.
  5. Kye, H., Kim, J., Ju, S., Lee, J., Lim, C., & Yoon, Y. (2023). Microplastics in water systems: A review of their impacts on the environment and their potential hazards. Heliyon, 9(3), e14359.
  6. Le Bihanic, F., Cormier, B., Dassie, E., Lecomte, S., Receveur, J., Le Floch, S., Cachot, J., & Morin, B. (2025). Toxicity assessment of DMSO extracts of environmental aged beached plastics using human cell lines. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 289, 117604.
  7. Leslie, H. A., van Velzen, M. J. M., Brandsma, S. H., Vethaak, A. D., Garcia-Vallejo, J. J., & Lamoree, M. H. (2022). Discovery and quantification of plastic particle pollution in human blood. Environment International, 163, 107199.
  8. Tomonaga, T., Higashi, H., Izumi, H., Nishida, C., Kawai, N., Sato, K., Morimoto, T., Higashi, Y., Yatera, K., & Morimoto, Y. (2024). Investigation of pulmonary inflammatory responses following intratracheal instillation of and inhalation exposure to polypropylene microplastics. Particle and Fibre Toxicology, 21(1), 29.
  9. Wang, S., Lu, W., Cao, Q., Tu, C., Zhong, C., Qiu, L., Li, S., Zhang, H., Lan, M., Qiu, L., et al. (2023). Microplastics in the lung tissues associated with blood test index. Toxics, 11(9), 759.
  10. Yuan, Z., Nag, R., & Cummins, E. (2022). Ranking of potential hazards from microplastics polymers in the marine environment. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 429, 128399.